[Herky] Iowa - IL

[Jeff Napier]

Thanks for clarifying. I missed the first half kick-off and the announcers made it sound like it was Iowa's choice in the second half. In any case it is a baffling decision by Ferentz.


________________________________
From: Herky <herky-bounces at lists.herky.net> on behalf of Todd Wenndt <iowantodd at att.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 1:56 PM
To: herky at lists.herky.net
Subject: Re: [Herky] Iowa - IL

The issue is that Iowa, to start the game, after winning the toss,rather than choose to receive or defer, Iowa chose the wind. I thought it was a stupid choice. Thus Illinois got 1st choice in the 2nd half. The result was that Illinois gets the ball in both halves and gets the wind in the fourth quarter. Incredibly poor thought process there. But it looks like we are going to overcome that. 14-0 Iowa!
Todd Wenndt


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone<https://yho.com/footer0>


On Saturday, November 19, 2016, 12:46 PM, Jeff Napier <jnapier111 at outlook.com> wrote:

Can someone explain the logic of not taking that ball in the second half.  Take the ball and you also have the win in the fourth quarter.  What does that say about Ferentz view of the Iowa offense?


________________________________
From: Herky <herky-bounces at lists.herky.net> on behalf of Jeff Napier <jnapier111 at outlook.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 12:41 PM
To: herky at lists.herky.net
Subject: Re: [Herky] Iowa - IL


Iowa defense looking good but this offense ....

_______________________________________________
Herky mailing list
Herky at lists.herky.net
http://lists.herky.net/listinfo.cgi/herky-herky.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.herky.net/pipermail/herky-herky.net/attachments/20161119/d04b2924/attachment.htm>